<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Twitter, please don&#8217;t kill your market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-882</guid>
		<description>Oh, I still love Twitter, too.  I think what they actually meant to do was elminate REPEAT tweets, where you&#039;re tweeting the exact same message over and over again. I believe they just didn&#039;t think about all the ways that recurring tweets are used (as per my latest blog post).  Right now, I can still manually do recurring tweets. It&#039;s just more of a pain in the tush.

In fact, it&#039;s because I love Twitter that I&#039;m concerned. As I said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll make it as just a social network. And I want Twitter to make it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I still love Twitter, too.  I think what they actually meant to do was elminate REPEAT tweets, where you&#8217;re tweeting the exact same message over and over again. I believe they just didn&#8217;t think about all the ways that recurring tweets are used (as per my latest blog post).  Right now, I can still manually do recurring tweets. It&#8217;s just more of a pain in the tush.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s because I love Twitter that I&#8217;m concerned. As I said, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll make it as just a social network. And I want Twitter to make it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Greathouse</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Greathouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-880</guid>
		<description>So what do I think happens next? Twitter will have less Spam (Yeah!) and the amount of people on twitter may drop. Most of those lost will be spammers but unfortunately many of them could be content creators who do not believe they have the resources (time or money) to get their message out effectively with Twitter without the help of automated recurring tweets.

Now let’s take yet another step back and not forget the world was still spinning before Twitter cut out recurring tweets. As business owners we need to adapt with technology. Twitter is just one of many tools at our disposal. The greatest tool we have is our minds, continue to use that to think of new and creative ways to grow your business. My message to twitter: You broke my heart a little but I still love you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do I think happens next? Twitter will have less Spam (Yeah!) and the amount of people on twitter may drop. Most of those lost will be spammers but unfortunately many of them could be content creators who do not believe they have the resources (time or money) to get their message out effectively with Twitter without the help of automated recurring tweets.</p>
<p>Now let’s take yet another step back and not forget the world was still spinning before Twitter cut out recurring tweets. As business owners we need to adapt with technology. Twitter is just one of many tools at our disposal. The greatest tool we have is our minds, continue to use that to think of new and creative ways to grow your business. My message to twitter: You broke my heart a little but I still love you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Gedeon</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Gedeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-853</guid>
		<description>I am a big fan of twitter and have been using it a very long time, but I am also excited to see an open source competitor growing up, and many other alternatives also coming along.

I think twitter&#039;s elimination of repeats is the wrong move for twitter. The spammers already have very effective tools to get around this. For example, using multiple link shorteners and multiple landing pages combined with a little random text. The users they will lose are the ones they want the most.

That said, this is probably good for the users in the long run because it opens the door wider for competition. Competition, if nothing else, spurs on creativity. It is even good for Twitter because they are less likely to be treated as a monopoly by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big fan of twitter and have been using it a very long time, but I am also excited to see an open source competitor growing up, and many other alternatives also coming along.</p>
<p>I think twitter&#8217;s elimination of repeats is the wrong move for twitter. The spammers already have very effective tools to get around this. For example, using multiple link shorteners and multiple landing pages combined with a little random text. The users they will lose are the ones they want the most.</p>
<p>That said, this is probably good for the users in the long run because it opens the door wider for competition. Competition, if nothing else, spurs on creativity. It is even good for Twitter because they are less likely to be treated as a monopoly by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-852</guid>
		<description>I agree. They need to define this more clearly. See my latest blog post for four scenarios. http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ Hard for me to believe they meant to ban all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. They need to define this more clearly. See my latest blog post for four scenarios. <a href="http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ</a> Hard for me to believe they meant to ban all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-851</guid>
		<description>I have no idea. See my latest blog post http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ. It all depends upon how they are defining recurring tweets. And I think that&#039;s very unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea. See my latest blog post <a href="http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ</a>. It all depends upon how they are defining recurring tweets. And I think that&#8217;s very unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-849</guid>
		<description>I agree re: spamming and blasting. 

Lately, I&#039;ve been seeing a new type of spamming. People who @ tweet me out of the blue trying to &quot;converse&quot; with me. But they have nothing to say and aren&#039;t asking anything relevant. I think they are just trying to use the &quot;conversation&quot; or &quot;relationship&quot; method to gain followers, by trying to strike up conversations out-of-the-blue with random people. I think that&#039;s just as spammy and sleazy as mass following, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree re: spamming and blasting. </p>
<p>Lately, I&#8217;ve been seeing a new type of spamming. People who @ tweet me out of the blue trying to &#8220;converse&#8221; with me. But they have nothing to say and aren&#8217;t asking anything relevant. I think they are just trying to use the &#8220;conversation&#8221; or &#8220;relationship&#8221; method to gain followers, by trying to strike up conversations out-of-the-blue with random people. I think that&#8217;s just as spammy and sleazy as mass following, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-848</guid>
		<description>This is such a good point!! I didn&#039;t even think about the time-difference issue. Or Iran!  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a good point!! I didn&#8217;t even think about the time-difference issue. Or Iran!  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-847</guid>
		<description>I hope you&#039;re wrong about pushing small biz to other platforms. On the other hand, if Twitter really has made a business decision to go for the larger business market and ignore the rest, they are, of course, entitled to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re wrong about pushing small biz to other platforms. On the other hand, if Twitter really has made a business decision to go for the larger business market and ignore the rest, they are, of course, entitled to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-846</guid>
		<description>I really suggest you take a look at my latest post and see what I use recurring tweets for. http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ I rescheduled eight of them last night. Two of them were requests for people to take my survey. The others were tweeting other people&#039;s content or research data I thought would be of interest. None were ads. I think you&#039;re making the same mistake Twitter has, and not considering all the ways people are using recurring tweets for purposes other than spamming people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really suggest you take a look at my latest post and see what I use recurring tweets for. <a href="http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2jeAJJ</a> I rescheduled eight of them last night. Two of them were requests for people to take my survey. The others were tweeting other people&#8217;s content or research data I thought would be of interest. None were ads. I think you&#8217;re making the same mistake Twitter has, and not considering all the ways people are using recurring tweets for purposes other than spamming people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neicole</title>
		<link>http://nmc.itdevworks.com/index.php/2009/10/dear-twitter-please-dont-kill-your-market/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Neicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=943#comment-845</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that this is a circumstance where, to a large degree, the market will take care of itself. People who retweet the exact same thing over and over again will get unfollowed. And I also use Twitter for business socializing, mainly. For those people that use it purely for personal socializing, this probably is a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that this is a circumstance where, to a large degree, the market will take care of itself. People who retweet the exact same thing over and over again will get unfollowed. And I also use Twitter for business socializing, mainly. For those people that use it purely for personal socializing, this probably is a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
